With mixed messages he could not control, Justin Trudeau scrambled to get the vaccine message back on track

OTTAWA — For once, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau did not give his advice to scientists to listen.

Instead, on Tuesday, the Prime Minister and his top public health officials tried to clear the air before the cameras, a day before a federal advisory body blew the clouds, and Canadians should not wait for any “favorite” vaccine Recommended to do, but to take any COVID -19 vaccination as soon as possible.

For Trudeau, who has stopped his government’s pandemic response to listening to the advice of health experts and “following the science”, it would have been difficult if the hypocrites were not directly credible to the National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) Challenging or throwing away. Reversed his Monday message and placed it under the bus.

Trudeau therefore avoided any talk of “favorite” shots, and canceled Monday’s recommendation by NACI that people want to wait for mRNA vaccines, which is not associated with the risk of very rare blood clots. He then launched an attempt at damage control and injected common sense into the discussion.

He said that all vaccines approved by Health Canada are “safe and effective” and that mass vaccination is “an important tool” to end the epidemic.

“The effects of catching COVID are far greater and far more deadly than the potential side effects,” Trudeau said at a news conference on Parliament Hill.

He also said that he was “very, very happy” for the shot of AstraZeneca.

“The reality is, the way we get through this epidemic is to get the vaccine that we are offered as soon as possible.”

On Monday, NACI caused confusion and concern when it said that mRNA vaccines made by Pfizer and Moderna are “favorites” over more traditional viral vector vaccines made by AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson.

The advisory panel suggested that they are not as effective as Pfizer and Moderna, and carry a very modest risk – one in 100,000 – in blood clots, so individuals should evaluate their risk on which vaccine to take.

The expert panel said that Canadians should take this small risk into consideration, and weigh it against the risk of the virus. If you’re younger, living in a location with low levels of infection, and have the privilege of working from home during an epidemic, it said that you might consider waiting for NACI’s “favorite” shots – Pfizer -MRNA vaccines from BioNTech and Moderna.

It represents a major change from the public health message to the present day, to take the first job offered to you.

Public health officials, physicians, epidemiologists, as well as Trudeau and senior government officials in the Prime Minister’s Office, immediately knew that the message they had been pushing for months had just been muddied.

In fact, this was not surprising for many of them.

NACI had previewed the message to the government and some outside health experts, who are often contacted by the media for public comment. But because it is an independent body, government officials were not in a position to control the NACI message.

Instead, during Monday evening and Tuesday morning, he prepared that Trudeau and Canada’s Chief Public Health Officer Drs. How to bring that message back to regular briefings by Theresa Tam.

Trudeau and Tam are determined to drive back the negotiations for the safety and efficacy of all vaccines approved by Health Canada.

So did many outside experts.

Speaking on the CBC on Tuesday morning, Dr. David Nailor, co-chairman of a group called the National COVID-19 Immunity Task Force, questioned the NACI’s conclusion that mRNA vaccines should be preferred when in clinical studies, Johnson & Johnson And AstraZeneca shots are shown. Effective in preventing severe illness and death with COVID-19.

“This is an uncertain message because it suggests that you have received the second best vaccine,” Naylor said of NACI’s advice.

“Let’s not get into Gucci vs. Rolex vs. no-name branding based on questionable effectiveness comparisons,” Naylor said.

In an interview with Starr, Naylor said NACI used “horrifying” comparisons to suggest that mRNA vaccines are more effective, adding that studies did not compare apples to apples. All vaccines are effective, and the risks, although real, are very low, he said.

It’s loading…

It’s loading…It’s loading…It’s loading…It’s loading…It’s loading…

And if NACI really believed mRNA vaccines were better, Naylor questioned that its recommendation was not to prioritize vulnerable populations, at-risk groups and the “preferred” workers needed for Pfizer and Modern Shots, but rather those. To explain the risks. An early AstraZeneca or Johnson & Johnson dose.

With COVID-19 still a major threat, particularly in Alberta, Manitoba, Ontario and Nova Scotia, many feared that NACI might hesitate to take vaccines as a precaution. Some say that there is a huge amount of public trust in the NACI message.

“With due respect to NACI, there should be no c preferred vaccines for COVID-19”. A thoughtful, informed choice based on personal risks related to age, gender, community transmission is a must. The superiority of vaccination is dangerous, ”tweeted Dr., an infectious disease doctor. Abdu Sharkawi.

He said, ‘I keep hearing about’ specifics’ when it comes to liking the COVID19 vaccine. ” “My colleague had many people under the age of 60 in the ICU who refused an axi vaccine the week before. Nunes bought him a ventilator. Please do not shop until you fall. “

Naylor, however, believes the damage to the public trust will be minimal, partly because there is a flood of Pfizer and Moderna vaccines on the horizon – three million doses will come this week alone – and because Canadians “take unequal decisions Via “Soldiers Are Lockdown and Mockdown and Restart and Lie Begins …

“I think people will find their way through the current vaccine confusion,” he said. “We will continue to do a lot of jabs in the arms.”

Procurement Minister Anita Anand said that by the end of June, Canada expects to receive 50 million vaccine doses from all suppliers.

So far, Canada has received 300,000 doses of the Johnson & Johnson vaccine, but it continues to deliver, while production issues for one of its components are investigated.

More than 2.3 million doses of the AstraZeneca vaccine have already been delivered in Canada, with about two million more expected by the end of June.

Conservative MP Michel Rempel Garner called on the Liberal government to clear up the confusion around the vaccine.

“The people of Canada need clear, concise and constant communication for the use of the vaccine,” Raphael Garner said in a written statement on Tuesday.

This is not the first time health officials have been accused of spreading confusion during an epidemic. In March, researchers criticized public health officials for issuing varying advice on delays in the second shot of vaccines requiring two doses.

NACI will soon offer more guidance, Tam said, on optimal timing for second shots, and on whether people will be able to take a different type of vaccine as a second shot.

While the advice for now is to stick with the same vaccine for the second shot, he said that research is ongoing, and there have been suggestions that mixing and dose matching may be of benefit.


Latest articles

Related articles